Fourth Circuit protects Booking.com's trademark

February 6, 2019

The United States Patent and Trademark Office, also known as the Fourth Circuit, deals with trademark standards for companies whose names consist of generic words and internet domains, has confirmed the branding protection of travel website giant, Booking.com.

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office had argued that Booking.com could never be protected because the term is generic, not descriptive, but a federal judge in Virginia sided with the company in 2017, and the Richmond-based federal appeals court upheld that ruling 2-1 Monday.

“Unlike general terms such as ‘crab house,’ looking to the component parts of a domain name may not unambiguously represent the primary significance of the term as a whole given that the relevant public may recognize domain names to indicate specific locations on the internet,” U.S. Circuit Judge Allyson Duncan wrote for the majority. “Thus, even where the domain-name-as-mark technically describes the service provided, it does not necessarily follow that the public commonly understands the mark to refer to the service broadly speaking.”

In its brief, Booking.com called trademark protection necessary to stop “unscrupulous competitors [that] prey on its millions of loyal consumers.”

But U.S. Circuit Judge James Wynn argued in a dissent Monday that this is a problem of the company’s own making. 

By choosing to operate under a generic domain that describes the nature of the services it offers, Booking.com is able to “attract the wealth of customers who simply search the web for that service,” wrote Wynn, who was appointed to the bench by President Barak Obama.

“However, in electing that benefit, the entity accepts a trade-off,” the dissent continues. “It must forego the ability to exclude competitors from using close variants of its domain name. On the other hand, the entity can choose to operate under a non-generic domain name — and thereby potentially limit, at least before it has built consumer awareness of its branding, the universe of potential customers who will find its business. Trademark law affords an entity that selects this latter option a special benefit. It can bar competitors from trading on any goodwill and recognition it generates in its domain name.”

Read more here

Join us in Bangkok the 19th to the 21st of March for the Property Portal Watch Conference.

Property Portal Watch Bangkok Conference. Mar 19-21, 2019

February 6, 2019

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the famous, free Friday newsletter!

News and analysis to help build better online marketplace businesses, in your inbox, every Friday

Related News

Untitled Design 15 1
Realtor.com Reveals Updated Traffic Claims in Blog

Realtor.com has reported strong growth in traffic, engagement, and search visibility on a new blog post, citing recent data from...

Read More
Zoopla New Logo Houses 1
Business Masthead Claims Silver Lake Has Put £500M Price Tag on Zoopla

The British business-focussed newspaper, City AM has claimed that the UK's number two portal Zoopla has been put up for...

Read More
Untitled Design 11 2 2
CoStar Group Q1: Revenue Up 12% as Homes.com Experiments with Vendor-Paid Advertising

CoStar Group has reported strong Q1 2025 results, with the U.S.-based real estate data and marketplaces giant posting $732 million...

Read More
Prophero 3
PropHero Cuts Australian Staff as Focus Turns Towards Europe and Asia

PropHero, the AI-powered CRM platform that helps property buyers find investment opportunities, has confirmed changes to its Australian operations just...

Read More

Editor's Pick