Zillow and Redfin Move to Dismiss FTC Lawsuit Over Rental Syndication Deal

January 15, 2026

Zillow and Redfin have asked a federal court to dismiss the FTC’s antitrust challenge to their rental listing syndication partnership, pushing back hard against claims that the deal was designed to sideline competition.

The motion, filed on Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Virginia, follows the consolidation of two related lawsuits in late November. The original legal action was brought by the Federal Trade Commission alongside attorneys general from Virginia, Arizona, New York, Connecticut and Washington.

At the heart of the case is a rental syndication agreement under which Redfin exited much of the multifamily rental listings space and began distributing listings through Zillow. Regulators have characterised the arrangement as effectively Zillow paying Redfin around $100 million to stop competing.

In a memorandum supporting the motion to dismiss, the companies argue the deal does the opposite, claiming it “makes renters and property managers better off and the rental advertising business more competitive.”

Zillow and Redfin say the partnership expanded the volume and reach of rental listings available to consumers, while delivering more qualified renter leads to landlords. They also point to Redfin’s struggles to scale its standalone rentals business prior to the agreement, and Zillow’s desire to strengthen its rental marketplace for both users and advertisers.

According to the filing, the deal allowed Redfin to redeploy capital away from an “underperforming rental advertising business” and into areas where it competes more directly with Zillow and other portals for consumer traffic.

The defendants also take aim at the regulators’ legal framing, arguing the plaintiffs failed to show any actual harm to competition. They say the lawsuit overlooks the two-sided nature of rental marketplaces, serving both landlords and renters, and relies on an incorrectly defined market that overstates Zillow and Redfin’s market power.

A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for 25 February. The case is one of five major lawsuits Zillow is currently facing.

January 15, 2026
Since March 2020 Edmund's job has been to read about, write about, collect data on, analyse and generally know about real estate marketplaces and the companies that run them. Before that he worked at the aggregator Mitula Group (which became Lifull Connect) for five years.

Subscribe to our mailing list to get the famous, free Friday newsletter!

News and analysis to help build better online marketplace businesses, in your inbox, every Friday

Related News

Zillow seattle
Zillow Brings High-Intent Home Shopper Data to Pinterest

Brands can now reach Zillow’s home shoppers on Pinterest. For the first time, Zillow is bringing its audience data—built from people’s...

Read More
alma media 1
Alma Media Q2 and H1 2026: Revenues Up 5% as Real Estate Delivers Strong Performance

Alma Media, the company behind well-known marketplaces in Finland, has released its interim report for 2026, with a strong period...

Read More
Lifull boardroom 2
Lifull Q3 2026: HOME's Services Revenues Up 4.5%

Lifull recorded its eleventh consecutive quarter of revenue growth for its HOME'S Services segment in the third quarter of 2026....

Read More
idealista boardroom 3
Idealista FY25: Revenues Up 15% as EBITDA Doubles

Idealista reported revenues of €346 million and an EBITDA of €160 million in 2025, but net losses of €191 million...

Read More

Editor's Pick